Complete part I (the worksheet), Part II, & Part III
The sources I reviewed are given bellow but choose the ones that have an abstract and most importantly, the ones required according to the instructions. If they do not meet the requirements, kindly find the suitable ones.
Bellin, J. (2014). The inverse relationship between the constitutionality and effectiveness of New York City stops and frisk. BUL Rev., 94, 1495.
Chu, C., Lu, E. Y., Wang, C., & Tsai, T. (2016). Grounding Police Accountability and Performance in Context: A Comparative Study of Stop and Frisk Between New York City and Taipei City. Public Administration & Development, 36(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1755
Evans, D. N., Maragh, C. L., & Porter, J. R. (2014). What do we know about NYC’s stop and frisk program? A spatial and statistical analysis. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(2), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.12.66
Howell, K. B. (2015). Gang policing: The post stop-and-frisk justification for profile-based policing. U. Denv. Crim. L. Rev., 5, 1.
Miller, T. R., Lawrence, B. A., Carlson, N. N., Hendrie, D., Randall, S., Rockett, I. R., & Spicer, R. S. (2017). Perils of police action: a cautionary tale from US data sets. Injury prevention, 23(1), 27-32.
Milner, A. N., George, B. J., & Allison, D. B. (2016). Black and Hispanic Men Perceived to Be Large Are at Increased Risk for Police Frisk, Search, and Force. PloS one, 11(1), e0147158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147158
Nebeker, C., Harlow, J., Espinoza Giacinto, R., Orozco-Linares, R., Bloss, C. S., & Weibel, N. (2017). Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives. AJOB empirical bioethics, 8(4), 266-276.
Ponte Carvalho, G., & Duarte, E. P. (2018). Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and Constitutional courts’ role in assuring the right to counsel during the police investigation. Rev. Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 4, 303.