week 4 HC306

I’m trying to learn for my Health & Medical class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Unit 4 Assignment – Data Presentation

Submit Assignment

  • Due Feb 2 by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Instructions

Reference the following website for helpful information to complete this assignment:

You have recently been hired as a revenue-cycle management specialist at Raywood Memorial Hospital. Your direct supervisor, the VP of Revenue-Cycle Management, has asked you to prepare a presentation for the next stakeholder meeting. Keeping in mind, the stakeholder group is composed of both financial and non-financial professionals.

  • Complete the fields in the attached table, illustrating national benchmark data, and RMH data.
    • Supply data of your choosing anywhere red text is present
  • Create a brief Powerpoint presentation for the stakeholder meeting, summarizing the data contained in the excel document.
    • In one slide, explain the RMH’s overall fiscal condition, as defined by the metrics in the excel document.
    • Highlight three metrics (one per slide)
      • Briefly explain to the stakeholders why you chose those three to focus on for the purpose of this meeting.
      • Explain the relationship between national benchmarks and RMH data; providing explanations for data that falls short of, and exceeds, the benchmark.
    • Summarize RMH’s “next steps” in a closing slide
    • Include a minimum of three references, APA style, in a final slide.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

Submit:

  • Data Presentation (PowerPoint)
  • Excel document with completed data fields

Assignment File(s)

Rubric

HC306 Unit 4 Assignment – Data Presentation

HC306 Unit 4 Assignment – Data Presentation

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

35.0 pts

5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

32.0 pts

4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

28.0 pts

3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

25.0 pts

2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

21.0 pts

1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

35.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

45.0 pts

5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

41.0 pts

4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

36.0 pts

3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

31.0 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

27.0 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

45.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

10.0 pts

5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

9.0 pts

4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

8.0 pts

3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

7.0 pts

2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6.0 pts

1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

10.0 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

9.0 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

8.0 pts

3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

7.0 pts

2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

6.0 pts

1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

<a href="https://herzing.instructure.com/courses/8126/modules/items/465557" role="button" class="Button module-sequence-footer-button–previous" data-tooltip="right" data-html-tooltip-title=" Unit 4 Discussion – Key Performance Indicators” aria-describedby=”msf0-previous-desc”>PreviousNext

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount