Two peer replies, must be 100 words each

I’m working on a Mathematics exercise and need support.

Instructions: Responses should be a minimum of 100 words and may include direct questions. In the peer responses, pick a confidence level other than 95% , i.e. 90%, 99%, 97%, any other confidence level is fine. Have fun and be creative with it and calculate another T-confidence interval and interpret your results. Compare my results to that of the initial 95% of the two peers, how much do they differ? How useful can this type of information be when you go to buy a new car, or even a house?

Peer 1 (Stacia ):

T-Critical Value

To find the 95% T-Critical Value, I first found 1-.95, which was .05. Since we have to both add and subtract from .05, I divided .05/2 = .025. I then subtracted .025 from 1, to get a probability of .975. Then I needed to find the degree of freedom. The degrees of freedom, which is our sample size minus 1. (10-1=9). Now that I have found those two, I can insert them into my formula in Excel.

=T.INV(.975,9)= 2.26215716

I then plug this number into the equation: ̅x± T∗ ( SD/√ N)

37,149.40 + 2.26215716 * (10038.59662/3.16227766) = $44,330

37,149.40 – 2.26215716 * (10038.59662/3.16227766) = $29,968

This concludes that there is a 95% confidence that the sample price of cars will be between $29,968 and $44,330.

Z- Critical Value

For the Z Critical Value, I need to use my p and q from week 3.

p = 0.60

q = 0.40

To find the 95% confidence interval, I will subtract .95 from 1, to give me .05. Since we will be adding and subtracting, I will divide .05/2, to give me .025. In order to use Excel, I need to subtract 1-.025, which gives me .975. The formula I will use in Excel is =NORM.S.INV(.975). This gives me a Z-Critical Value of 1.96 (rounded).

Now, I will plug everything into the equation: ̂p± Z∗ (√ ̂p∗ ̂q /n )

.60 + 1.96*(√.6*.4/10) = 90.36418943, or 90.4%

.60 – 1.96 *(√.6*.4/10) = 29.63581057, or 29.6%

This means that there is a 95% confidence that proportion of cars sampled that falls below the average goes from 29.6% to 90.3%.

I was not surprised by the intervals. After looking through all of my data from the car prices, it all made sense.

Peer 2 ( Martine):

1. T-Critical Value: In order to find the 95% T-Critical Value, I subtracted .95 from 1 to get .05. then divided that by 2 to receive .025, and after subtracting that from 1, I end with a final result of .975. In order to find the degree of freedom, I subtracted 1 from the sample size of 10, resulting in a total of 9.

Using this data within Excel, the formula then looks like this =T.INV(0.975,9) = 2.2621571628

I then take the number and insert it, along with other data from week 1 into the following formula: ̅x± T∗ ( SD/√ N) which ends up looking like so:

a. 41,117+2.2621571628*(16,398/√10) = 52847.42254411


b. 41,117-2.2621571628*(16,398/√10) = 29386.57745588

Therefore, there is a 95% confidence that the sample price of vehicles will be between $29,386.57 and $52,847.42.

2. Z-Critical Value: To find this, we’ll look back to week 3 when we found these values:

Success (p) = 0.6

Failure (q) = 0.4

I will use the same intro as I did for the T-Critical Value but I will switch the Excel formula to Norm.S.Inv and end with =NORM.S.INV(0.975), giving us a result of 1.9599639845.

Now I will plug all of my values into the following formula ̂p± Z∗ (√ ̂p∗ ̂q /n ) which gives us:

a. 0.6+1.9599639845*(√0.6*0.4/10) = 0.9036


b. 0.6-1.9599639845*(√0.6*0.4/10) = 0.2964

Therefore, there is a 95% confidence that the proportion of cars sampled which fall below the average ranges from 90.36% and 29.64%.

I wouldn’t say I felt surprised by any of these results, as I worked the data and equations it kind of all seemed to fall in line.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount