1- 2 page APA

I’m studying for my Psychology class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

Dog Personality (Links to an external site.)

Do canines have character? As this ScienCentral News video reports, according to one psychologist, personality testing is going to the dogs.

Once you watch the short video write a 1 -2 page paper answering the questions below using material that was covered in chapter 2. This is a formal assignment, make sure to use APA format.

  1. What kinds of research methods are involved in assessing personality in animals? What are the sources of data that were used in this research?
  2. What sorts of biases could be involved when assessing animal personality?
  3. Can you think of some ways to assess individual differences in animals other than dogs? What kinds of animals would you study? What kinds of tests would you use?

Rubric

Application & Critical Thinking (1)

Application & Critical Thinking (1)

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat

3.0 pts

APA format was used. The following were used appropriately as stated in the syllabus and handout in all sections of the assignment: Citations, references, font, font size, margins, double spaced, and left aligned.A cover page, and reference page was included. Also met minimum page required.

2.0 pts

APA format was used with minor errors in one or two of the following: Citations, references, font, font size, margins, double spaced, and left aligned.A cover page, and reference page was included. Also met minimum page required.

1.0 pts

The student used some APA format, but not throughout assignment. Student either did not follow the format provided in syllabus or handout. Inconsistent or missing in the following areas: Citations, references, font, font size, margins, double spaced, and left aligned, cover page, and reference page. Or the student did not minimum page required.

0.0 pts

Student did not apply APA format or follow the instruction provided in syllabus or handout.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking

8.0 pts

Student a great job with critical thinking throughout assignment. Student was able to evaluate the effects of the media and mental illness. Student did a great job defending or opposing thoughts, values, and facts. Student displayed both objective and subjective values.

6.0 pts

Student a good job with critical thinking throughout assignment. Student was able vaguely evaluate the effects of the media and mental illness. Student vaguely was able to defend or oppose thoughts, values, and facts. Student displayed more subjective than objective values.

0.0 pts

Student did not display critical thinking throughout assignment. Student was not able to evaluate the effects of the media and mental illness. Student did a poor job defending or opposing thoughts, values, and facts.

8.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar

2.0 pts

Excellent grammar used: indented 5 spaces at the beginning of each paragraph, used paragraphs, appropriate sentence structure, punctuations, spell check, appropriate words used (no slang), and proof read before submitted.

1.0 pts

Good grammar used. Some minor issues with: no indentation at the start of each paragraph, none or some paragraphs, some appropriate sentence structure, minimal use of punctuations, some areas had misspelled words, used slang or some inappropriate terms, and not all areas were proof read before submitting.

0.0 pts

Poor grammar used in several of the following: no paragraphs, inappropriate sentence structure, no punctuations, no spell check, inappropriate words used (slang), or did not proof read before submitting.

2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication

7.0 pts

Student did a great job with application. Student was able to use acquired knowledge from course work to problem solve, identify connections and relationships, and how they are applicable in different situations.

4.0 pts

Student did a good job with application. Student vaguely used acquired knowledge from course work to problem solve, barely was able to identify connections and relationships, and how they are applicable in different situations.

0.0 pts

Student did not display any understanding of the NASW and NOHS code of ethics. Student was not able to explain how and why the code of ethics should be applied when working in the human service profession.

7.0 pts

Total Points: 20.0

<a href="https://icampus.instructure.com/courses/82089/modules/items/1914439" role="button" class="Button module-sequence-footer-button–previous" data-tooltip="right" data-html-tooltip-title=" Discussion #2- What Does Your Profile Pic Say About You? { Chapter 2- Personality Research Methods } (Initial post due Thursday and Responses by Monday)” aria-describedby=”msf0-previous-desc”>PreviousNext

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount